HTML-List Lead Balloon: Alternatives?

> Barely making it is 22K/s with 16 bit samples, at which a 2 second sound
> byte would take almost 6 minutes to download at 2K/s.

I haven't measured download speeds, and you apparently have, so I'll presume
you know what you're talking about.

> I have to agree with John ff, HTML is not acceptable for email. Only MS
> mail, Netscape mail, and late-model versions of Eudora will even display
> it, to my knowledge.

Those seem to be the most popular Email programs, or at least the most
talked-about in the trade rags, but I may be mistaken.

OK, it's flagrantly obvious that nobody would participate in an HTML
supplementary tuning list.

Let's hear some specific alternatives then. Some of you have suggested
some
sort of a website for sound- or graphic-intensive ideas or questions. How
would you suggest such a thing be managed?

What means can we use to get put more actual music into our discussions about
music?

I am, by the way, curious about what Email programs you folks use.

> Barely making it is 22K/s with 16 bit samples, at which a 2 second sound
> byte would take almost 6 minutes to download at 2K/s.

I haven't measured download speeds, and you apparently have, so I'll presume
you know what you're talking about.

> I have to agree with John ff, HTML is not acceptable for email. Only MS
> mail, Netscape mail, and late-model versions of Eudora will even display
> it, to my knowledge.

Those seem to be the most popular Email programs, or at least the most
talked-about in the trade rags, but I may be mistaken.

OK, it's flagrantly obvious that nobody would participate in an HTML
supplementary tuning list.

Let's hear some specific alternatives then. Some of you have suggested
some
sort of a website for sound- or graphic-intensive ideas or questions. How
would you suggest such a thing be managed?

What means can we use to get put more actual music into our discussions about
music?