crossed lines (Erlich)

>Surely you're leaving some out! Even restricting ourselves to 5-limit
>consistent ETs under 53, the rms error gives the following ranking (and
>accuracy values for 1% std. dev.):

These threads are getting too fast for the likes of me. Did you see that I
said I missed some? Thanks for posting this ranking. It agrees quite well
with mine, which is nice. Of course I did have some knowledge of the
errors involved, but I didn't look up any I didn't know.

Carl

Carl Lumma wrote,

>These threads are getting too fast for the likes of me. Did you see
that I
>said I missed some?

I saw that later -- it is me that these threads are getiing too fast
for.