Re: Gary

>But anyway, although I started exploring 88CET five years ago, I've
>really only explored it for about three years. So I'll keep at it a few
>more years, but definitely move on in time.

You're not me (thank god!). But if you were you'd move up to 41tET. Say
what you will, but it's close enough to 88CET, and octaves are a nice
bonus. You'd get Kyma (just got an amazing upgrade and lower price) and
design groovy additive patches with 41tET overtones.

>Thanks again, Carl, for reviewing the CD. By the way, tell us more
>about your concern that "Snake Dance" sounded "interesting but
>unconvincing".

Close your eyes. Imagine yourself dancing with snakes. I don't think so.
Seriously, this song put all its eggs in one basket. It is either going to
create an image or not. If you're not dancing by the end, so to speak, it
didn't work. I was surprised, because I found Haverstick's world-inspired
34tET stuff on Acoustic Stick very convincing.

Carl

> You're not me (thank god!). But if you were you'd move up to 41tET.

Yes, 41TET is a strong possibility I've considered. 34TET is another, as
well as more work with harmonic-series fragments.