back to list

handy consonance measures

🔗Carl Lumma <clumma@xxx.xxxx>

3/12/1999 7:33:30 AM

>Re-reading Dave's e-mail to me, I see that the sum [of numerator and
>denominator] only models critical-band roughness well if the _sum_ is 17
or >less.

Why is that again? I don't know which e-mail this refers to...

>Note that my harmonic entropy model, to the accuracy that I've evaluated
it so >far, did not show local minima at 11/8 or 13/8, but there was a very
tiny one >at 11/6.

What did I tell you about that Goldstein stuff? You need a finer N (or
whatever). Anything where the 7/5 pulls in the 11/8 is too course!

Carl

🔗Paul H. Erlich <PErlich@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx>

3/12/1999 4:01:45 PM

>>Note that my harmonic entropy model, to the accuracy that I've
evaluated
>it so >far, did not show local minima at 11/8 or 13/8, but there was a
very
>tiny one >at 11/6.

Carl Lumma wrote,

>What did I tell you about that Goldstein stuff? You need a finer N (or
>whatever). Anything where the 7/5 pulls in the 11/8 is too course!

I disagree and stick with the model. 11/8 by itself doesn't quite cut
it. In an otonal chord, though, it definitely does cut it, but as you
know I haven't been able to formulate a harmonic entropy model for
chords of more than two notes.