back to list

Re: Partch

🔗rumsong@xxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)

1/6/1999 8:16:01 AM

Greetings,

About Partch:

What has become of the instruments?

Also, BTW I will be publishing a brilliant review of Gilmore's book by the
excellent critic Adrian Corleonis in the upcoming newsletter of the Friends
of Gunnar Johansen. I think I might also post it at my web site.

All best wishes,

Gordon Rumson

🔗Afmmjr@aol.com

1/8/2001 7:38:21 AM

There are many levels to Harry Partch, perhaps some of them are negative,
most show stark originality and a specific point of view. Dissimilar to
Daniel Wolf, I have a different set of Partch favorites.

Some see Partch for the just intonation harmony, while I see more of the
American English intonation of meaning as more spectacular. I would consider
"U.S. Highball" as both a Partch and an American classic, if not a 20th
century masterpiece. "Dark Brother" is by no means a failure. More failing,
for me, is "Lord is My Shepherd," while I never fully enjoyed "Bewitched."

Yes, the music can sound dated since Partch was an Elvis man, pre-Beatles.
And he had a tough personality to bear (some would say as well as for Bach
and Beethoven), but he was a good person who pioneered much of what music has
become.

Johnny Reinhard

🔗Paul H. Erlich <PERLICH@ACADIAN-ASSET.COM>

1/8/2001 7:30:58 AM

I find you can get into much of Partch from the Frank Zappa angle. If you
like Zappa, you should begin to like some Partch after a few good listens
spread over at least a week -- you need repeated exposures to break down
your mental barriers to the highly unusual tuning, but you'll already be
somewhat accustomed to the odd rhythms and textures from Zappa.