Re: inflation in coherence

I've just remarked the end << Pierre? >> at Paul message 14492.

I take it Paul invite me to reassure on what he knows soon. I have a great
respect for him. I never wanted to hurt neither him nor his friends. For
me, viril debate with creativity has no sense of resentement. It was a
parry to face avalanche of English words with an easy way to express an
intellectual position. Paul has perfectly interpreted my words and I had no
doubt on that. Interlude is terminated.

I hope to find soon the time to carry on answers about coherence and maybe
(probably later) to read on periodicity blocks.

-Pierre

Pierre wrote,

>I take it Paul invite me to reassure on what he knows soon.

I can't understand that sentence. Perhaps it results from a literal
translation from the French?

>For me, viril debate with creativity has no sense of resentement.

You seemed to be saying "Why do I even bother?" a few days ago. I'm glad you
no longer feel that way.

>Paul has perfectly interpreted my words and I had no
>doubt on that.

Hmm . . . on the contrary, I feel that I interpret your words correctly
about 60-70% of the time and thus my continual requests for clarification.

>I hope to find soon the time to carry on answers about coherence

Looking forward to it!

[I wrote:]

>For me, viril debate with creativity has no sense of resentement.

[Paul:]

>You seemed to be saying "Why do I even bother?" a few days ago. I'm glad you
no longer feel that way.

My problem has nothing to do with resentment or any bad feelings. I keep
confident since our off-list explanation a few weeks ago. I have only great
difficulties to post in English. I'll talk no more of "barrier language"
since most people seem to minimize, interpreting probably as if I was
talking about capacity to express correctly my ideas.
"Time/work/stress/energy/burning barrier" qualifies really better what I'm
living. On the contrary, my problem is I want more than I can.

Hoping rapid energy return.

-Pierre