[Graham Breed:]

> Yes, the quantum harmonics stuff I

> mentioned before is pretty much fuzzy

> logic. It's still close to QM in that

> they can both come from probability

> matrices.

So then this may be a useful term after

all?

The development of my lattice diagrams

over the past 5 years or so has tended in

the direction of what I imagine "probability

matrix" refers to. I've looked into some

books on lattice theory, but alas, it's

far beyond my full understanding.

[Breed:]

> p.s. This weeks New Scientist says that

> the uncertainty principle in QM may

> all have been a big mistake!

. . . but they're not sure, right?

-monz

___________________________________________________________________

You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.

Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html

or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]