Badings

Joseph Pehrson wrote,

>Yes! Actually a pretty important figure on the Darmstadt scene...
>progressive in tuning concepts, from what I can gather, and
>almost entirely neglected...

>Now "there's" a good project for "Continuum" or a similar performing
>group (!!)

How can we make this happen???

--- In tuning@egroups.com, "Paul H. Erlich" <PERLICH@A...> wrote:

http://www.egroups.com/message/tuning/13970

> >Now "there's" a good project for "Continuum" or a similar
performing
> >group (!!)
>
> How can we make this happen???

Well, I (or some of my associates who know him even better) could
mention it to Joel Sachs. Actually, come to think of it, he usually
does retrospectives of older, LIVING composers.

From time to time people do take up the Bloch cause, at least here in
New York... and I'd be surprised if they don't in Boston as well.

The best thing, of course, is to write a postcard to a performing
group that "dips" into some contemporary literature...
_____________ ____ __ _
Joseph Pehrson

--- In tuning@egroups.com, "Joseph Pehrson" <pehrson@p...> wrote:

http://www.egroups.com/message/tuning/13973

>>
> > >Now "there's" a good project for "Continuum" or a similar
> performing
> > >group (!!)
> >
> > How can we make this happen???
>

Whoops... Sorry Paul. I see here you're talking about Badings, not
Bloch, who is generally pretty amply represented.

Well, is Badings still living?? In that case he might indeed be a
possible project for Joel Sachs and Continuum...

________ ___ __ __ _
Joseph Pehrson

Joseph wrote,

>Well, is Badings still living?? In that case he might indeed be a
>possible project for Joel Sachs and Continuum...

Sadly, Johnny Reinhard reported to us recently that Badings had passed away
. . .

Joseph wrote,

>http://www.egroups.com/message/tuning/13970
>>>Now "there's" a good project for "Continuum" or a similar
performing
>>>group (!!)

And then:

>From time to time people do take up the Bloch cause, at least here in
>New York... and I'd be surprised if they don't in Boston as well.

Weren't you talking about Badings?

--- In tuning@egroups.com, "Paul H. Erlich" <PERLICH@A...> wrote:

http://www.egroups.com/message/tuning/13978

> Joseph wrote,
>
> >http://www.egroups.com/message/tuning/13970
> >>>Now "there's" a good project for "Continuum" or a similar
> performing
> >>>group (!!)
>
> And then:
>
> >From time to time people do take up the Bloch cause, at least here
in New York... and I'd be surprised if they don't in Boston as well.
>
> Weren't you talking about Badings?

You're right! And then I "reverted" back to Bloch, almost in
"default mode!" It shows how pervasive Bloch is in my thinking (or
non-thinking!). Of course, I would enjoy hearing more Bloch too!!
but he is, naturally, much better represented than Badings... whose
representation is close to zero...
_________ ____ __ _ _
Joseph Pehrson