Re: Simple Ratio

Paul,

Thanks for your detailed response.

>One is most definitely _not_ to omit factors of
>2 in calculating a*b. The model in question
>does not assume octave-equivalence. This
>seems to agree well with experience -- for
>example, 7:3 is more concordant than 7:6
>which is more concordant than 12:7.

Agreed.

Now I have a much better idea what you are getting at!

....

Robert