Re: Digest Number 82

[Dan Stearns:]
> I was not disagreeing with the statement I quoted
> from Paul... The bit you quoted me on is referring
> to a twenty-fourth tone, 144tET notation...

I didn't say you disagreed with Paul - sorry if I
implied it, didn't mean to do that either. I was
simply emphasizing that Sims does not need
a notation more complex or more accurate than
his 72-Eq to get close enough (to the JI results
he's looking for) to satisfy him.

- Monzo : )
___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]