RE: [tuning] Re: What about stack 442 ?

Pierre wrote,

>Good. It's what I had supposed and why I wanted precision. Now, I would
>like to discuss about that. It seems to me an artefact. Because (3 1 5 13)
>chord is on long descending slope of "total discordance", it is not weakly
>deformed but eliminated. It falls in (9 3 15 5) chord. Tone 13/12 is masked
>by 10/9 tone. I tend to consider this distance quite large.

A true chordal harmonic entropy would probably have different results -- it
would probably have a local minimum at 6:8:10:13 as well as one at
9:12:15:20.