Re: What about stack 442 ?

Paul,

(Oops, I forgot subject in precedent post)

I wrote :

>Second tetrad (3 31 5 13) is not in list of 34 tetrads for third tetrad
>(stack of 442), very near, is less discordant. Ok. Why first tetrad (3 1 5
>13) is not in list of 34 tetrads ?

And you wrote :

<< It is not a local minimum. When relaxed, it falls into the local minimum

0 499 886 1385. >>

Good. It's what I had supposed and why I wanted precision. Now, I would
like to discuss about that. It seems to me an artefact. Because (3 1 5 13)
chord is on long descending slope of "total discordance", it is not weakly
deformed but eliminated. It falls in (9 3 15 5) chord. Tone 13/12 is masked
by 10/9 tone. I tend to consider this distance quite large.

What do you think about that ?

Pierre Lamothe