Re: [tuning] newjustintonation egroup

Joseph Pehrson wrote:

> Well, just (literally) in case everybody wants to know what's going
> on... like I did, I had no clue... Kraig Grady has started his OWN
> splinter tuning group "newjustintonation."
>
> http://www.egroups.com/group/newjustintonation
>
> So far, there are only 24 persons on the group... but it may grow
> since I also just :) applied.

The group was started back in January. Low traffic.

--
* D a v i d B e a r d s l e y
* 49/32 R a d i o "all microtonal, all the time"
* http://www.virtulink.com/immp/lookhere.htm

Yes Joe
i think that I would not consider it exclusionary as much as focused.
Just Intonation in my opinion is much simpler and a more stable system
the tuning list IMHO for the most part is full of mathematicians, not
musicians
it is a basic split as old as the pythag cult itself
mathematikoi and acoustamakoi

Pat Pagano, Director
South East Just Intonation Society
http://www.virtulink.com/immp/video/
----- Original Message -----
From: Joseph Pehrson <josephpehrson@compuserve.com>
To: <tuning@egroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 8:51 AM
Subject: [tuning] newjustintonation egroup

>
> Well, just (literally) in case everybody wants to know what's going
> on... like I did, I had no clue... Kraig Grady has started his OWN
> splinter tuning group "newjustintonation."
>
> http://www.egroups.com/group/newjustintonation
>
> So far, there are only 24 persons on the group... but it may grow
> since I also just :) applied.
>
> I imagine the ratios might get rather large over there sometimes...
>
> I'm not quite certain that it is a good idea to "splinter" off from
> the main tuning list over disagreements in style and content, if that
> had anything to do with it. I'm more for "plurality" myself, and
> toleration of other peoples' opinions and HEY, even PERSONALITIES!
> There have been onerous (one-groups, get it) postings from various
> people from time-to-time, but "big deal." Like they say "get over
> it."
>
> Maybe I've lived in New York too long, but it doesn't PHASE :) me at
> all, as long as we're all learning something and at least trying to
> communicate.
>
> I do note that "newjustintonation" is a little more "exclusionary"
> than the "Tuning List." I was not allowed to immediately join, as in
> this list. I supposed the idea is to "filter out" certain
> troublesome individuals.
>
> However, for me, I AM, a bonefide card-carrying just intonationist!
> I have my card right here! I have several pieces in just intonation!
>
> I'm hoping my application will be approved, and, certainly, everybody
> is free to start their own groups but, for the sake of diversity of
> viewpoints, I would urge everybody who posts to Kraig's site (and I
> hope they DO) will make similar postings over here, so that people
> don't have to constantly go "back and forth" and to enhance the
> plurality of the group. Well, that's my admittedly "biased" opinion.
>
> __________ ____ __ __ __
> Joseph Pehrson
>
>
>
>
>
> You do not need web access to participate. You may subscribe through
> email. Send an empty email to one of these addresses:
> tuning-subscribe@egroups.com - join the tuning group.
> tuning-unsubscribe@egroups.com - unsubscribe from the tuning group.
> tuning-nomail@egroups.com - put your email message delivery on hold for
the tuning group.
> tuning-digest@egroups.com - change your subscription to daily digest
mode.
> tuning-normal@egroups.com - change your subscription to individual
emails.
>
>
>

--- In tuning@egroups.com, "shreeswifty" <ppagano@b...> wrote:

http://www.egroups.com/message/tuning/12616

> Yes Joe
> i think that I would not consider it exclusionary as much as
focused. Just Intonation in my opinion is much simpler and a more
stable system
...

> it is a basic split as old as the pythag cult itself
> mathematikoi and acoustamakoi

Yes, and I suppose the list will also include no "hoi polloi..."

Well, I've made my contribution.

My post is #50.

http://www.egroups.com/message/newjustintonation/50

__________ ____ __ __ _
Joseph Pehrson