RE: [tuning] Re: harmonic entropy stuff, van Eck's model

Carl wrote,

>>0.01414622188897297 (3 2)

John wrote,

>Carl, I'm not getting quite the same results. For example, for 3/2,
>I have the interval nestled between 100/67 and 98/65, which, if I'm
>understanding the "rules" involved here, means that the influence
>spans between (100+3)/(67+2) and (98+3)/(65+2), i.e., between 103/69
>and 101/67, or between 1.49275 and 1.50746, or 0.014709 total range.

John, the "range" must be measured logarithmically. So
1.50746/1.49275=1.0098543, and log(1.0098543)/log(2) agrees with Carl's
result.