RE: [tuning] Johnny Reinhard's "quartertone +/- < 50 cents" notat ion

Johnny wrote,

>When using either - 31 for the seventh harmonic, or + 29, there is a number

>greater than 25 in place.

What does that mean? Where would you used +29?

>Efficiency is best with > 50 because actual
>practice often retains "just" or tonal identification.

>Monzo, the quartertone accidentals are in no way identical with a constant
>quartertone system. Paul Erlich actually posted about the > 25 possibility
a
>couple of years ago, and I did consider it. However, my music is tonally
>based, and I need the flexibility.

Johnny, in a similar vein (I think), I plan to (in the next day or two)
notate the 22-tET piece in 12-tET with +/- 50 cent notations but no
quartertone accidentals. The harmonies are 9-limit with 15, and 12-tET is
consistent within that limit . . . and the progression as a whole doesn't
drift when performed in 12-tET . . . however, most of the steps are 1/22
oct. (54.5 cents).