RE: [tuning] re: Paul Erlich auditory experiment

Carl Lumma wrote,

>That's important, but even more important is the fact that they
>really are similar. You're listening to your 5679 chord in JI file
>twice, calling it correctly once, and incorrectly calling it the
>utonal 4567 in JI the other time. The utonal 4567 in 22 file is
>right, however.

Thanks so much Carl. You are right. I listened to my own files and compared
them with Joseph's -- they don't match. Joseph used the 5:6:7:9 chord twice,
calling it 5:6:7:9, and then calling it 1/7:1/6:1/5:1/4.