Yes, Strict JI

Paul wrote:
>In the way we've been using the terms, "strict" and "adaptive" tuning are
>opposites. You must mean strict JI, since adaptive JI would allow lots of
>sub-commatic shifts to cancel the net drift.
>
>Oh, well, thanks for the clarification. Yes, I mean strict JI. Guess >you can tell I'm new here... : )

--- In tuning@egroups.com, "Patrick K. Mullen" <mullen@c...>
wrote:
> Paul wrote:
> >In the way we've been using the terms, "strict" and "adaptive"
tuning are
> >opposites. You must mean strict JI, since adaptive JI would
allow lots of
> >sub-commatic shifts to cancel the net drift.
> >
> >Oh, well, thanks for the clarification. Yes, I mean strict JI.
Guess
> >you can tell I'm new here... : )

Geez! What was that? Sorry about the huge typeface...