Re: [tuning] Re: It's all too much

Paul Erlich wrote,

> So even if the math-oriented material were on a separate list, we'd
probably come back to this list often to report our findings, involve
others in listening experiments, etc. And even if our attempts at
mathematical understanding are way off, and we've deceived ourselves
in our attempts to model our musical experiences with math, we'll
still end up producing and inspiring some interesting music as a
result (witness Dan Stearns :) :) :)).

Hey, how'd I wind up in this? Ah well, for whatever it's worth
(nothing...), most tell me that the 'math' business is at least almost
interesting; a kind way off indicating that the 'music' is best left
unaddressed... and either way it's safe to say that I'm generally
advised "to hold on to that day job" (or to "get off my damn a-- and
get one!" by those who know better...). Anyway, I'm going back to
minding my own business now!

gone fishing,
Dan