Re: [tuning] Re: microtonal articles

Paul Erlich wrote,

> the basic hexad is an exceedingly rough approximation of
8:9:10:11:13:14,

Now was an 8:9:10:11:13:14 interpretation also (even if in some vague
way) Scriabin's?

Dan

--- In tuning@egroups.com, "D.Stearns" <STEARNS@C...> wrote:
> Paul Erlich wrote,
>
> > the basic hexad is an exceedingly rough approximation of
> 8:9:10:11:13:14,
>
> Now was an 8:9:10:11:13:14 interpretation also (even if in some
vague
> way) Scriabin's?

If you mean, did Scriabin analyze it this way, I don't know, but his
chord has certainly been analyzed that way by others beside Scriabin.