back to list

Re: [tuning] Digest Number 667

🔗Brian M. Ames <bmames@apk.net>

6/8/2000 3:19:33 PM

I, too, have run into a tempo problem with Cakewalk when sequencing
Borodin's Polovtsian dances. It seems that anything greater that 250 gets
reduced to 250. A work-around is to change the time signature, 4/4->2/4,
6/8->3/8, 3/4->? I have also found that Cakewalk moves program changes to
the beginning of a track if it is the first event on the track. This really
creates problems when multiple tracks share the same MIDI channel. I get
around that one by putting an extra measure with a short, ppp note at the
beginning of each track. Most the time, though, I just use another sequencer.

Brian

>Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 08:17:40 -0600
> From: "John A. deLaubenfels" <jadl@idcomm.com>
>Subject: Cakewalk speed problems
>
>I've just heard from a list member that, playing retuned versions of
>wamk280 (one of the Mozart pieces I've posted recently) through
>Cakewalk, the pace of the piece is slower than the original.
>
>I seem to remember hearing a similar lament from another list member
>a few months back, also involving Cakewalk.
>
>I do rearrange the MIDI clock definition, in order to achieve .001 sec
>per clock pulse, but I'm PRETTY sure I'm doing it correctly; also, the
>pieces play fine on, for example, Media Player, which comes with Win 95.
>(and if Uncle Bill can get it right, surely the rest of us can as well!)
>
>I don't have Cakewalk and haven't used it, but I'm guessing it's trying
>to be "too clever" in some way that could possibly be turned off.
>Does anybody know more about this?
>
>Thanks!
>
>JdL
>