An almost 11-limit comma pump played in 5-limit JI

Hi there.

Although I was playing this in 5-limit JI, it has clear 11-limit implications:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8497979/pp_almost_11-limit_diatonic_pump.mp3

Petr

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Petr Pařízek <petrparizek2000@...> wrote:
>
> Hi there.
>
> Although I was playing this in 5-limit JI, it has clear 11-limit
> implications:
>
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8497979/pp_almost_11-limit_diatonic_pump.mp3

This is insanely great!

My best guess so far is that the 11-limit implications involve the 100/99 comma (25/18~11/8).

Do you mind if I blatantly rip off this chord progression? Works great in porcupine.

Keenan

Hi Keenan.

> This is insanely great!

Thanx. :-)

> My best guess so far is that the 11-limit implications involve the 100/99 > comma (25/18~11/8).

100/99 is much too wide for this. It's (11/8)/((10/9)^3).

Do you mind if I blatantly rip off this chord progression? Works great in porcupine.

Do you think so? Well, I haven't tried that.

Petr

I wrote:

> Do you think so? Well, I haven't tried that.

Actually, it can't work; porcupine equates three 10/9s with 4/3, not 11/8.

Petr

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Petr Parízek <petrparizek2000@...> wrote:
> > My best guess so far is that the 11-limit implications involve the 100/99
> > comma (25/18~11/8).
>
> 100/99 is much too wide for this. It's (11/8)/((10/9)^3).

Ah, okay, another 81/80 off from what I was thinking. Not 100/99, but good old 8019/8000 temperament.

> Do you mind if I blatantly rip off this chord progression? Works great in
> porcupine.
>
> Do you think so? Well, I haven't tried that.

Well, since porcupine doesn't temper out 8019/8000 this specific thing wouldn't actually work. But the distorted porcupine version of this I heard in my head works just as well. Even better since I won't technically be ripping you off!

Keenan