back to list

Re: [cm] Digest Number 76

🔗Robert Walker <robertwalker@...>

11/8/2001 5:10:01 PM

Hi Carl,

> No, no... not another Yahoo group! I just want to get e-mails
> about updates, beta versions, etc.

Okay, I wonder, maybe the others will feel the same, as that
was the description of the listbot one.

I can do it so that only the owner can post. Have to move
from listbot as they are closing down their free service.

Indeed, done so: Announcement/Newsletter (Moderators can post
messages)

You may want to wait until I've reposted the old messages,
or I could add you to the e-mails list to be sent invitation
to join.

If anyone wants a discussion type group as well, I can do
a separate one for that.

> >I'll prob. include it anyway if it is only going to be a few lines
> >and a tick box. Could perhaps use it for exploring lattices too e.g.
> >successive white keys of one keyboard go up 5/4, of another,
> >3/2, etc. Or whatever,... Just a thought, don't know if that
> >will be useful to do.

> Def.

Okay, will do.

> But this also destroys something else the 12-tet composer is
> used to seeing... the chords of the diatonic scale looking the
> same anywhere on the staff!!

True.

> Having successive scale notes mapped to successive staff positions
> is very important to me as a composer... plenty enough to give up
> the location of my octaves.

Fine. Anyway it is something one can decide when one starts work on
the piece, and isn't inherent in the method one way or the other.
I can see the point.

Perhaps I'm approaching this more from performer perspective
- I like to be able to easily read the score and try to play
a part on some instrument or indeed on retuned keyboard, and
I find that easier if the octaves of score are in the place
I expect them. Just habit of course and one could prob. learn
not to expect that, and get used to various spacings for the
"octave".

> > Already downloaded a couple of the pdfs from anaphoria
> > to puzzle over!

> That list was in order... Wilson's stuff is the last stuff you'd
> want to read on the topic.

Okay fine. However, as web addresses, were the first ones I went to!
Thanks again.

Robert