I sympathize with the confusion over the term "Val". You have named
its dual after our friend Monz. Graham's approach has always been, I
think, to work with these directly, so why not refer to them with the
term "Breed" (which happens to be descriptive as well!)?
--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Erlich" <perlich@a...>
wrote:
> I sympathize with the confusion over the term "Val". You have named
> its dual after our friend Monz. Graham's approach has always been,
I
> think, to work with these directly, so why not refer to them with
the
> term "Breed" (which happens to be descriptive as well!)?
Either that, or we could get Graham to change his name to Val.
--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, "Gene Ward Smith" <gwsmith@s...>
wrote:
> --- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Erlich" <perlich@a...>
> wrote:
> > I sympathize with the confusion over the term "Val". You have
named
> > its dual after our friend Monz. Graham's approach has always
been,
> I
> > think, to work with these directly, so why not refer to them with
> the
> > term "Breed" (which happens to be descriptive as well!)?
>
> Either that, or we could get Graham to change his name to Val.
And get Monzo to change his name to Val Dual hee hee