7-limit horagrams

/tuning-math/files/Erlich/sevenlimit.zip

--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Erlich" <perlich@a...>
wrote:
>
/tuning-math/files/Erlich/sevenlimit.zip

I dumped the awful name "quartiminorthirds" in favor of "valentine",
which you may recall from over a year ago:

/tuning-math/files/Paul/dualzoomer.gif

Beautiful! I take it the green lines are proper scales?

-C.

--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Erlich" <perlich@a...>
wrote:
> --- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Erlich" <perlich@a...>
> wrote:
> >
>
/tuning-math/files/Erlich/sevenlimit.zip
>
> I dumped the awful name "quartiminorthirds" in favor
of "valentine",
> which you may recall from over a year ago:
>
> /tuning-math/files/Paul/dualzoomer.gif

Sounds OK; let's hope it doesn't choke Dave.

--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, "Carl Lumma" <ekin@l...> wrote:
> Beautiful! I take it the green lines are proper scales?
>
> -C.

Guess again (it's easy)!

>> Beautiful! I take it the green lines are proper scales?
>>
>> -C.
>
>Guess again (it's easy)!

Obviously not easy enough if we've had to exchange three
messages about it.

-Carl

--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, Carl Lumma <ekin@l...> wrote:
> >> Beautiful! I take it the green lines are proper scales?
> >>
> >> -C.
> >
> >Guess again (it's easy)!
>
> Obviously not easy enough if we've had to exchange three
> messages about it.
>
> -Carl

Then you can't actually be looking at the horagrams ;)

>> >> Beautiful! I take it the green lines are proper scales?
>> >>
>> >> -C.
>> >
>> >Guess again (it's easy)!
>>
>> Obviously not easy enough if we've had to exchange three
>> messages about it.
>>
>> -Carl
>
>Then you can't actually be looking at the horagrams ;)

Why not just explain things rather than riddling your users?

-Carl

--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, Carl Lumma <ekin@l...> wrote:
> >> >> Beautiful! I take it the green lines are proper scales?
> >> >>
> >> >> -C.
> >> >
> >> >Guess again (it's easy)!
> >>
> >> Obviously not easy enough if we've had to exchange three
> >> messages about it.
> >>
> >> -Carl
> >
> >Then you can't actually be looking at the horagrams ;)
>
> Why not just explain things rather than riddling your users?

Because I'm trying to encourage some looking.

>> >> >> Beautiful! I take it the green lines are proper scales?
>> >> >
>> >> >Guess again (it's easy)!
>> >>
>> >> Obviously not easy enough if we've had to exchange three
>> >> messages about it.
>> >
>> >Then you can't actually be looking at the horagrams ;)
>>
>> Why not just explain things rather than riddling your users?
>
>Because I'm trying to encourage some looking.

I've tested several possibilities about what the green could mean,
and your continued refusal to simply provide the answer is assinine,
with a double s.

-Carl

--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, Carl Lumma <ekin@l...> wrote:
> >> >> >> Beautiful! I take it the green lines are proper scales?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Guess again (it's easy)!
> >> >>
> >> >> Obviously not easy enough if we've had to exchange three
> >> >> messages about it.
> >> >
> >> >Then you can't actually be looking at the horagrams ;)
> >>
> >> Why not just explain things rather than riddling your users?
> >
> >Because I'm trying to encourage some looking.
>
> I've tested several possibilities about what the green could mean,
> and your continued refusal to simply provide the answer is assinine,
> with a double s.

I'm ssorry.

Green-black-green-black-green-black-green-black-green-black-green-
black . . .

Wasn't that your idea in the first place?

>I'm ssorry.
>
>Green-black-green-black-green-black-green-black-green-black-green-
>black . . .
>
>Wasn't that your idea in the first place?

I think so, and this is one of the patterns (including even, odd,
prime, proper ...) I ruled out. Look at decimal.bmp. 10 & 14
are both green.

-Carl

--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, Carl Lumma <ekin@l...> wrote:
> >I'm ssorry.
> >
> >Green-black-green-black-green-black-green-black-green-black-green-
> >black . . .
> >
> >Wasn't that your idea in the first place?
>
> I think so, and this is one of the patterns (including even, odd,
> prime, proper ...) I ruled out. Look at decimal.bmp. 10 & 14
> are both green.
>
> -Carl

I guess my debugging is at fault, then! Wow, I sure win the ass award
for suggesting you needed to look more!