pelogic and kleismic/hanson

See

http://www.anaphoria.com/keygrid.PDF

page 7 seems to be using some pelog terminology; anyone familiar with
it?

page 10 provides further support for my proposal of "hanson" as a
name for kleismic (i.e., dave keenan's chain-of-minor-thirds scale)

On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:37:28 -0000, "Paul Erlich" <perlich@aya.yale.edu>
wrote:

>See
>
>http://www.anaphoria.com/keygrid.PDF
>
>page 7 seems to be using some pelog terminology; anyone familiar with
>it?

I'm not familiar with this terminology, but the keyboard is clearly based
on a generator of 5 steps of 23-ET, while the generator of pelogic
temperament is 10 steps of 23. In other words, this is the scale I've been
calling "superpelog", with the basic 9-note MOS subset used as the basis
for a system of notation.

I'll add a reference to this paper on my superpelog page:

http://www.io.com/~hmiller/music/superpelog.html

--
see my music page ---> ---<http://www.io.com/~hmiller/music/index.html>--
hmiller (Herman Miller) "If all Printers were determin'd not to print any
@io.com email password: thing till they were sure it would offend no body,
\ "Subject: teamouse" / there would be very little printed." -Ben Franklin

>>See
>>
>>http://www.anaphoria.com/keygrid.PDF
>>
>>page 7 seems to be using some pelog terminology; anyone familiar with
>>it?
>
>I'm not familiar with this terminology, but the keyboard is clearly
>based on a generator of 5 steps of 23-ET, while the generator of pelogic
>temperament is 10 steps of 23. In other words, this is the scale I've
>been calling "superpelog", with the basic 9-note MOS subset used as the
>basis for a system of notation.
>
>I'll add a reference to this paper on my superpelog page:
>
>http://www.io.com/~hmiller/music/superpelog.html

Be careful; Erv does not view these as ETs. He sees them as general-
purpose cycles, which may be interpreted as ETs if you like, even
though he doesn't usually like.

-Carl

--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, Herman Miller <hmiller@I...>
wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:37:28 -0000, "Paul Erlich" <perlich@a...>
> wrote:
>
> >See
> >
> >http://www.anaphoria.com/keygrid.PDF
> >
> >page 7 seems to be using some pelog terminology; anyone familiar
with
> >it?
>
> I'm not familiar with this terminology, but the keyboard is clearly
based
> on a generator of 5 steps of 23-ET, while the generator of pelogic
> temperament is 10 steps of 23. In other words, this is the scale
I've been
> calling "superpelog", with the basic 9-note MOS subset used as the
basis
> for a system of notation.
>
> I'll add a reference to this paper on my superpelog page:
>
> http://www.io.com/~hmiller/music/superpelog.html

Kyewl!