Here are lists from 50000 to 1000000 of ets with log-flat measure less than 1, together with its measure. Note that 258008 appears on both lists; it would also appear in the 15 and 17 limits.

Eleven limit

54624 .687840

121524 .637140

218002 .933133

258008 .745125

312632 .988525

563949 .949222

903475 .565789

1161483 .555994

2064958 .531236

2968433 .912912

Thirteen limit

81860 .755085

87939 .756550

96478 .645002

161530 .656916

184417 .975711

258008 .614009

354486 .988733

442425 .925813

1024999 .971305

1106859 .997514

5033391 .592631

5291399 .984485

5475816 .931178

8192932 .817337

--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, "Gene Ward Smith

<genewardsmith@j...>" <genewardsmith@j...> wrote:

> Here are lists from 50000 to 1000000 of ets with log-flat measure

less than 1, together with its measure. Note that 258008 appears on

both lists; it would also appear in the 15 and 17 limits.

>

>

> Eleven limit

>

> 54624 .687840

> 121524 .637140

> 218002 .933133

> 258008 .745125

> 312632 .988525

> 563949 .949222

> 903475 .565789

> 1161483 .555994

> 2064958 .531236

> 2968433 .912912

what happened to 504504?

--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, "wallyesterpaulrus <wallyesterpaulrus@y...>" <wallyesterpaulrus@y...> wrote:

> what happened to 504504?

I checked from 3 to 23, and it's not nearly good enough to make the cut in any of them. Are you sure this is the right number?

--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, "Gene Ward Smith

<genewardsmith@j...>" <genewardsmith@j...> wrote:

> --- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, "wallyesterpaulrus

<wallyesterpaulrus@y...>" <wallyesterpaulrus@y...> wrote:

>

> > what happened to 504504?

>

> I checked from 3 to 23, and it's not nearly good enough to make the

>cut in any of them. Are you sure this is the right number?

i got it from:

--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, "wallyesterpaulrus <wallyesterpaulrus@y...>" <wallyesterpaulrus@y...> wrote:

> --- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, "Gene Ward Smith

> <genewardsmith@j...>" <genewardsmith@j...> wrote:

> > --- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, "wallyesterpaulrus

> <wallyesterpaulrus@y...>" <wallyesterpaulrus@y...> wrote:

> >

> > > what happened to 504504?

> >

> > I checked from 3 to 23, and it's not nearly good enough to make the

> >cut in any of them. Are you sure this is the right number?

>

> i got it from:

>

> http://sonic-arts.org/dict/marc-edolist.htm

I'd guess he chose it on the basis of its prime factorization:

504504 = 2^3 3^2 5^2 7 11 13

I'm not sure why he didn't choose the lcm of all numbers up to 15

(360360) or 16 (720720) instead.

--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, "Gene Ward Smith > > http://sonic-arts.org/dict/marc-edolist.htm

>

> I'd guess he chose it on the basis of its prime factorization:

Sorry, that should be

504504 = 2^3 3^2 7^2 11 13

No 5s, obviously!

--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, "Gene Ward Smith

<genewardsmith@j...>" <genewardsmith@j...> wrote:

> --- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, "wallyesterpaulrus

<wallyesterpaulrus@y...>" <wallyesterpaulrus@y...> wrote:

> > --- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, "Gene Ward Smith

> > <genewardsmith@j...>" <genewardsmith@j...> wrote:

> > > --- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, "wallyesterpaulrus

> > <wallyesterpaulrus@y...>" <wallyesterpaulrus@y...> wrote:

> > >

> > > > what happened to 504504?

> > >

> > > I checked from 3 to 23, and it's not nearly good enough to make

the

> > >cut in any of them. Are you sure this is the right number?

> >

> > i got it from:

> >

> > http://sonic-arts.org/dict/marc-edolist.htm

>

> I'd guess he chose it on the basis of its prime factorization:

>

> 504504 = 2^3 3^2 5^2 7 11 13

that wouldn't make sense, since he also chose 15601 as "most

convenient" (this time for 3-limit), and it's prime!