ok, i just recently updated the links in my

"consistency" definition

http://www.ixpres.com/interval/dict/consiste.htm

and now i'm getting a "page cannot be found" error

when i try to view them

where are they hiding now?

-monz

_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

They're not hiding, you mistook the .html extensions

for .txt.

Manuel

> From: <manuel.op.de.coul@eon-benelux.com>

> To: <tuning-math@yahoogroups.com>

> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 7:23 AM

> Subject: Re: [tuning-math] the missing consistencies

>

>

> They're not hiding, you mistook the .html extensions

> for .txt.

thanks, Manuel, it's fixed now.

http://www.ixpres.com/interval/dict/consiste.htm

paul, you had asked me to change something about my graphics

here and in the "unique" definition ... what was it?

-monz

_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

--- In tuning-math@y..., "monz" <joemonz@y...> wrote:

> > From: <manuel.op.de.coul@e...>

> > To: <tuning-math@y...>

> > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 7:23 AM

> > Subject: Re: [tuning-math] the missing consistencies

> >

> >

> > They're not hiding, you mistook the .html extensions

> > for .txt.

>

>

> thanks, Manuel, it's fixed now.

> http://www.ixpres.com/interval/dict/consiste.htm

>

>

> paul, you had asked me to change something about my graphics

> here and in the "unique" definition ... what was it?

well, before i remind you of that, which data exactly are you

plotting here? i would have expected only odd number limits, since

you're restricing yourself to equal temperaments with an integer

number of notes per octave . . .

> From: paulerlich <paul@stretch-music.com>

> To: <tuning-math@yahoogroups.com>

> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:53 PM

> Subject: [tuning-math] Re: the missing consistencies

>

>

> > > They're not hiding, you mistook the .html extensions

> > > for .txt.

> >

> >

> > thanks, Manuel, it's fixed now.

> > http://www.ixpres.com/interval/dict/consiste.htm

> >

> >

> > paul, you had asked me to change something about my graphics

> > here and in the "unique" definition ... what was it?

>

> well, before i remind you of that, which data exactly are you

> plotting here? i would have expected only odd number limits, since

> you're restricing yourself to equal temperaments with an integer

> number of notes per octave . . .

hmmm ... i simply copied the data from Manuel's webpages

and pasted it into a spreadsheet, from which i made the graphs.

so i guess those integer-EDOs are merely signposts along

the x-axis. the plots correspond exactly with the data in

the spreadsheet, so the EDOs plotted are not integer divisions.

i admit that these graphs could be improved a lot -- this

was just a very quick-and-dirty deal. i've never really

understood these consistency tables well until now.

-monz

_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

--- In tuning-math@y..., "monz" <joemonz@y...> wrote:

> hmmm ... i simply copied the data from Manuel's webpages

> and pasted it into a spreadsheet, from which i made the graphs.

>

> so i guess those integer-EDOs are merely signposts along

> the x-axis. the plots correspond exactly with the data in

> the spreadsheet, so the EDOs plotted are not integer divisions.

>

> i admit that these graphs could be improved a lot -- this

> was just a very quick-and-dirty deal. i've never really

> understood these consistency tables well until now.

i don't think you're doing a good job of presenting this data

visually, and it couldn't be much improved in this format. i think it

would be far better to simply plot the odd-limit data for the integer

et case, if you wanted one graph to illustrate 'consistency'. if you

don't know how to read this information from manuel's table, you can

find it on paul hahn's website, for example

http://library.wustl.edu/~manynote/consist3.txt, which gives the

maximum errors within each odd limit (the columns are 3, 5, 7, 9, 11,

etc.) and ceases once inconsistency is reached.

> From: paulerlich <paul@stretch-music.com>

> To: <tuning-math@yahoogroups.com>

> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:17 PM

> Subject: [tuning-math] Re: the missing consistencies

>

>

> --- In tuning-math@y..., "monz" <joemonz@y...> wrote:

>

> > hmmm ... i simply copied the data from Manuel's webpages

> > and pasted it into a spreadsheet, from which i made the graphs.

> >

> > so i guess those integer-EDOs are merely signposts along

> > the x-axis. the plots correspond exactly with the data in

> > the spreadsheet, so the EDOs plotted are not integer divisions.

> >

> > i admit that these graphs could be improved a lot -- this

> > was just a very quick-and-dirty deal. i've never really

> > understood these consistency tables well until now.

>

> i don't think you're doing a good job of presenting this data

> visually, and it couldn't be much improved in this format. i think it

> would be far better to simply plot the odd-limit data for the integer

> et case, if you wanted one graph to illustrate 'consistency'. if you

> don't know how to read this information from manuel's table, you can

> find it on paul hahn's website, for example

> http://library.wustl.edu/~manynote/consist3.txt, which gives the

> maximum errors within each odd limit (the columns are 3, 5, 7, 9, 11,

> etc.) and ceases once inconsistency is reached.

yes, paul, i think you're probably right that that approach

would work (and look) better. i'll check it out ... thanks.

-monz

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com