on-topic subject lines [was:: 171-EDO, Vogel (was: 7-limit MT...)]

> From: paulerlich <paul@stretch-music.com>
> To: <tuning-math@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:29 PM
> Subject: [tuning-math] Re: 171-EDO, Vogel (was: 7-limit MT reduced bases
for ets)
>
>
> --- In tuning-math@y..., "genewardsmith" <genewardsmith@j...> wrote:
> > --- In tuning-math@y..., "monz" <joemonz@y...> wrote:
> >
> > > > 171: [2401/2400, 4375/4374, 32805/32768]
> > > >
> > > > Wouldn't want to do that--look at those three
> > > > high-powered commas!
> >
> > > (note that the title is an homage to Helmholtz)
> >
> > Helmholtz liked the schismic temperament, and Vogel goes him
> > one better by combining schismic with ennealimmal, which the
> > above reduced basis shows is one way of thiking about 171-et.
> > You could temper either 53 tones or 72 tones with it, among
> > other things.
> >
> > Since I am now writing a piece in 46-et and just finished one
> > in 53-et, I'll also add these:
> >
> > 46: [126/125, 245/243, 1029/1024]
> > 53: [225/224, 1728/1715, 3125/3087]
> >
> > I'm finding the 43-et set of commas quite useful.
>
> Do you really mean 43, or one of the above?

Guys, I try to be really diligent about changing the
subject line when the content of my post warrants it.

This one's apparently gone back to the one I diverted
it from.

-monz

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com