Re: no sevens

> From: "genewardsmith" <genewardsmith@juno.com>
> Subject: No sevens
>
> Here is a list of "no sevens" ets up to 500, with a "no sevens" badness measure.

I hope you plan on doing this again with the 9's in there. I've been looking at
34 as a potential "next direction" for some point in my future life and it
seems to have a lot of neat qualities as long as one leaves 7 out. I'm actually
looking at it as an "anti-31", as it is almost exactly as much a positive
temperment as 31 is negative, misses key features ("7" for instance, not
"miraculous") but adds others (unique 9-limit, better "13", etc...)

I was just surprised to see 34 (even if represented as 17) missing
from a "no sevens" list.

thanks

Bob Valentine