back to list

No sevens

🔗genewardsmith <genewardsmith@juno.com>

1/17/2002 2:52:42 PM

Here is a list of "no sevens" ets up to 500, with a "no sevens" badness measure. Of course corresponding "no sevens" linear temperaments can be treated just like 7-limit linear temperaments. The no-sevens version of Arabic would come from combining 24 and 31.

1 .874469118
2 .6628051687
3 .8991089882
4 .7970714166
6 .8907979318
7 .4849216657
8 .8491505000
9 .7640348589
15 .5562849116
16 .9056313011
22 .6677836946
24 .9023455495
31 .8249555856
65 .6413351099
72 .7439328269
87 .5140313008
152 .8880115141
183 .9262407104
270 .8140628426
342 .8784426512
407 .6748936949
494 .5791226647

🔗paulerlich <paul@stretch-music.com>

1/17/2002 3:06:08 PM

--- In tuning-math@y..., "genewardsmith" <genewardsmith@j...> wrote:
> Here is a list of "no sevens" ets up to 500, with a "no sevens" >
badness measure.

Meaning the nine intervals

1:3
1:5
3:5
1:9
5:9
1:11
3:11
5:11
9:11

are equally weighted?

🔗genewardsmith <genewardsmith@juno.com>

1/17/2002 5:11:51 PM

--- In tuning-math@y..., "paulerlich" <paul@s...> wrote:

> Meaning the nine intervals
>
> 1:3
> 1:5
> 3:5
> 1:9
> 5:9
> 1:11
> 3:11
> 5:11
> 9:11
>
> are equally weighted?

It probably should mean that, but I forgot to put in the nines. It's been a busy day and I was distracted.