More 72-et decatonics

We are reaching the end of the 4375/4374 lot; I had 132 of these, and these look like the best.

[0, 5, 12, 19, 24, 35, 42, 49, 54, 61]
[5, 7, 7, 5, 11, 7, 7, 5, 7, 11]
edges 16 25 32 33 connectivity 2 3 5 6

[0, 5, 12, 19, 30, 35, 42, 49, 56, 61]
[5, 7, 7, 11, 5, 7, 7, 7, 5, 11]
edges 13 23 30 33 connectivity 0 2 4 5

[0, 5, 12, 19, 24, 31, 42, 47, 54, 61]
[5, 7, 7, 5, 7, 11, 5, 7, 7, 11]
edges 16 24 31 32 connectivity 2 2 4 5

[0, 7, 12, 19, 30, 35, 42, 49, 56, 61]
[7, 5, 7, 11, 5, 7, 7, 7, 5, 11]
edges 15 23 31 32 connectivity 1 3 5 5

--- In tuning-math@y..., "genewardsmith" <genewardsmith@j...> wrote:
> We are reaching the end of the 4375/4374 lot; I had 132 of these,
and these look like the best.
>
> [0, 5, 12, 19, 24, 35, 42, 49, 54, 61]
> [5, 7, 7, 5, 11, 7, 7, 5, 7, 11]
> edges 16 25 32 33 connectivity 2 3 5 6
>
>
> [0, 5, 12, 19, 30, 35, 42, 49, 56, 61]
> [5, 7, 7, 11, 5, 7, 7, 7, 5, 11]
> edges 13 23 30 33 connectivity 0 2 4 5
>
>
> [0, 5, 12, 19, 24, 31, 42, 47, 54, 61]
> [5, 7, 7, 5, 7, 11, 5, 7, 7, 11]
> edges 16 24 31 32 connectivity 2 2 4 5
>
> [0, 7, 12, 19, 30, 35, 42, 49, 56, 61]
> [7, 5, 7, 11, 5, 7, 7, 7, 5, 11]
> edges 15 23 31 32 connectivity 1 3 5 5

Is the advantage of "connectivity" over "edges" is
that "connectivity" tends to favor triads, tetrads, etc.,
while "edges" merely looks at dyads?

--- In tuning-math@y..., "paulerlich" <paul@s...> wrote:

> Is the advantage of "connectivity" over "edges" is
> that "connectivity" tends to favor triads, tetrads, etc.,
> while "edges" merely looks at dyads?

Connectivity does tend to favor chords, but one advantage from my point of view is that I don't need to write any code to compute it. A high connectivity means the notes are tied together more closely, with more paths from one to another, as well.