The term "V-map" is stupid

I wish I had never come up with it. Will anyone object if I just call
these "subgroup matrices" instead? I'll do the work in changing the
2-3 pages on the wiki.

-Mike

I agree the term seems odd, but is it really worth changing?
A great contribution, V-maps are.

-Carl

At 09:35 AM 2012/12/09, you wrote:
>I wish I had never come up with it. Will anyone object if I just call
>these "subgroup matrices" instead? I'll do the work in changing the
>2-3 pages on the wiki.
>
>-Mike

I guess if people are already used to it, we can keep it. I remember
some reason I didn't just want to call them subgroup matrices, and
eventually settled on "val map" and "monzo map," which I then
shortened to V-map and M-map. I should have probably gone with
subgroup matrices though, in retrospect. At this point it looks like
category theory is getting involved anyway, so I should probably wait
to see what the full picture is before naming stuff.

-Mike

On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Carl Lumma <carl@lumma.org> wrote:
>
> I agree the term seems odd, but is it really worth changing?
> A great contribution, V-maps are.
>
> -Carl
>
>
>
> At 09:35 AM 2012/12/09, you wrote:
> >I wish I had never come up with it. Will anyone object if I just call
> >these "subgroup matrices" instead? I'll do the work in changing the
> >2-3 pages on the wiki.
> >
> >-Mike
>
>