The TE tuning minimizes the max TE-weighted error over all intervals

Is there some reason this statement is supposed to be controversial or
false? It appears to derive rather straightforwardly from the
definition of the dual norm on a Banach space.

-Mike

Mike Battaglia <battaglia01@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there some reason this statement is supposed to be
> controversial or false? It appears to derive rather
> straightforwardly from the definition of the dual norm on
> a Banach space.

It's interesting that optimizing the RMS of the
Tenney-limited prime errors seems to give the same result
as optimizing the minimax of the Tenney-weighted RMS-prime
errors. Could there be a way of proving it directly? A
pre-packaged theorem that already addresses this?

Graham

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Graham Breed <gbreed@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It's interesting that optimizing the RMS of the
> Tenney-limited prime errors seems to give the same result
> as optimizing the minimax of the Tenney-weighted RMS-prime
> errors.

What's "Tenney-weighted RMS-prime error?" You mean the minimax of the
TE norm-weighted error for all intervals?

-Mike