Fwd: 8th octave partials of the harmonic series (nearest cent).

--- In MicroMadeEasy@yahoogroups.com, "robert thomas martin"
<robertthomasmartin@...> wrote:

(0=128/128=0) (1=129/128=13) (2=130/128=27) (3=131/128=40)
(4=132/128=53) (5=133/128=66) (6=134/128=79) (7=135/128=92)
(8=136/128=105) (9=137/128=118) (10=138/128=130) (11=139/128=143)
(12=140/128=155) (13=141/128=167) (14=142/128=180) (15=143/128=192)
(16=144/128=204) (17=145/128=216) (18=146/128=228) (19=147/128=240)
(20=148/128=251) (21=149/128=263) (22=150/128=275) (23=151/128=286)
(24=152/128=298) (25=153/128=309) (26=154/128=320) (27=155/128=331)
(28=156/128=342) (29=157/128=354) (30=158/128=365) (31=159/128=375)
(32=160/128=386) (33=161/128=397) (34=162/128=408) (35=163/128=418)
(36=164/128=429) (37=165/128=440) (38=166/128=450) (39=167/128=460)
(40=168/128=471) (41=169/128=481) (42=170/128=491) (43=171/128=501)
(44=172/128=512) (45=173/128=522) (46=174/128=532) (47=175/128=541)
(48=176/128=551) (49=177/128=561) (50=178/128=571) (51=179/128=581)
(52=180/128=590) (53=181/128=600) (54=182/128=609) (55=183/128=619)
(56=184/128=628) (57=185/128=638) (58=186/128=647) (59=187/128=656)
(60=188/128=666) (61=189/128=675) (62=190/128=684) (63=191/128=693)
(64=192/128=702) (65=193/128=711) (66=194/128=720) (67=195/128=729)
(68=196/128=738) (69=197/128=746) (70=198/128=755) (71=199/128=764)
(72=200/128=773) (73=201/128=781) (74=202/128=790) (75=203/128=798)
(76=204/128=807) (77=205/128=815) (78=206/128=824) (79=207/128=832)
(80=208/128=841) (81=209/128=849) (82=210/128=857) (83=211/128=865)
(84=212/128=874) (85=213/128=882) (86=214/128=890) (87=215/128=898)
(88=216/128=906) (89=217/128=914) (90=218/128=922) (91=219/128=930)
(92=220/128=938) (93=221/128=945) (94=222/128=953) (95=223/128=961)
(96=224/128=969) (97=225/128=977) (98=226/128=984) (99=227/128=992)
(100=228/128=999)
(101=229/128=1007)
(102=230/128=1015)
(103=231/128=1022)
(104=232/128=1030)
(105=233/128=1037)
(106=234/128=1044)
(107=235/128=1052)
(108=236/128=1059)
(109=237/128=1066)
(110=238/128=1074)
(111=239/128=1081)
(112=240/128=1088)
(113=241/128=1095)
(114=242/128=1103)
(115=243/128=1110)
(116=244/128=1117)
(117=245/128=1124)
(118=246/128=1131)
(119=247/128=1138)
(120=248/128=1145)
(121=249/128=1152)
(122=250/128=1159)
(123=251/128=1166)
(124=252/128=1173)
(125=253/128=1180)
(126=254/128=1186)
(127=255/128=1193).

--- End forwarded message ---

Nobody here needs these tables dude.

-Carl

--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, Carl Lumma <carl@...> wrote:
>
> Nobody here needs these tables dude.
>
> -Carl
>
From Robert. I don't believe you. Your bully boy tactics are puerile
and don't work with me.

Robert wrote...

>> Nobody here needs these tables dude.
>
>I don't believe you. Your bully boy tactics are puerile
>and don't work with me.

I'll have to moderate you off then. You've been told many times
about this.

-Carl

--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, Carl Lumma <carl@...> wrote:
>
> Robert wrote...
>
> >> Nobody here needs these tables dude.
> >
> >I don't believe you. Your bully boy tactics are puerile
> >and don't work with me.
>
> I'll have to moderate you off then. You've been told many times
> about this.
>

No reason to do that, is there?

But also no reason to use words like "puerile", IMHO.

Apart from that: I would say, too, that this table is not really
necessary in this group here (tuning-math) - because it can be
assumed that every member of this group knows how to make this table -
and if not, the formula would be enough.

In the group MicroMadeEasy, OTOH, this table makes perfect sense. I
would say you could put it into the xenharmonic wiki, too.
--
Hans Straub