--- In tuning-math@y..., genewardsmith@j... wrote: > --- In tuning-math@y..., "Paul Erlich" <paul@s...> wrote: > > > Is the TM-reduced basis for the MIRACLE linear temperament in the > 11- > > limit > > > > {225/224, 243/242, 384/385}?? > > That's what I get, as well as {225/224, 441/440 and 540/539} as an > LLL reduced basis.

Can you think of a reason anyone would want to look at LLL rather than Minkowski?

--- In tuning-math@y..., "Paul Erlich" <paul@s...> wrote:

> May I anticipate any attempts to answer the other questions I've > asked you lately?

What were they? I somtimes lose track of outstanding questions, and sometimes decide I don't want to pursue something at the moment, and sometimes think I'll get around to it eventually anyway in the course of the survey or whatever.

--- In tuning-math@y..., genewardsmith@j... wrote: > --- In tuning-math@y..., "Paul Erlich" <paul@s...> wrote: > > > May I anticipate any attempts to answer the other questions I've > > asked you lately? > > What were they?