back to list

vals -- integers only?

🔗Carl Lumma <ekin@lumma.org>

11/30/2005 11:43:50 PM

Heya Gene (hope you're on the mend!),

From your page on vals

http://66.98.148.43/~xenharmo/intval.html

it sounds like they can only contain integers.

Would something like this

< 1195.0847320453368 1892.2174924051164 2788.531041439119 3386.073407461787 ]

therefore not be considered a val? Should I just multiply by a
suitable power of ten and drop the dot?

-Carl

🔗Gene Ward Smith <gwsmith@svpal.org>

12/1/2005 12:53:03 AM

--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, Carl Lumma <ekin@l...> wrote:
>
> Heya Gene (hope you're on the mend!),
>
> From your page on vals
>
> http://66.98.148.43/~xenharmo/intval.html
>
> it sounds like they can only contain integers.
>
> Would something like this
>
> < 1195.0847320453368 1892.2174924051164 2788.531041439119
3386.073407461787 ]
>
> therefore not be considered a val? Should I just multiply by a
> suitable power of ten and drop the dot?

I'd call it a point in val space, or a mapping to the reals, or a
linear functional.

🔗Carl Lumma <ekin@lumma.org>

12/1/2005 3:43:49 AM

>> Heya Gene (hope you're on the mend!),
>>
>> From your page on vals
>>
>> http://66.98.148.43/~xenharmo/intval.html
>>
>> it sounds like they can only contain integers.
>>
>> Would something like this
>>
>> < 1195.0847320453368 1892.2174924051164 2788.531041439119
>3386.073407461787 ]
>>
>> therefore not be considered a val? Should I just multiply by a
>> suitable power of ten and drop the dot?
>
>I'd call it a point in val space, or a mapping to the reals, or a
>linear functional.

Tx.

-Carl