back to list

Synched schismatic

🔗Gene Ward Smith <gwsmith@svpal.org>

10/12/2005 2:13:56 PM

The synched tuning for schismatic is poptimal, but you can avoid
synchronized beating if you wish with other poptimal tunings, such as
289-et. Below I give the synched tuning for two schismatic MOS, so you
can see what the beats do for you.

! schisynch17.scl
Schismatic[17] in synch (brat=-1) tuning
! fifth satisfies f^9 + f^8 - 64 = 0
17
!
91.360882
182.721764
203.455647
294.816529
386.177411
406.911294
498.272176
589.633058
680.993940
701.727824
793.088706
884.449587
905.183471
996.544353
1087.905235
1108.639118
1200.000000

! schisynch29.scl
Schismatic[29] in synch (brat=-1) tuning
! fifth satisfies f^9 + f^8 - 64 = 0
29
!
70.626999
91.360882
112.094765
182.721764
203.455647
274.082646
294.816529
315.550413
386.177411
406.911294
477.538293
498.272176
519.006060
589.633058
610.366942
680.993940
701.727824
772.354822
793.088706
813.822589
884.449587
905.183471
975.810469
996.544353
1017.278236
1087.905235
1108.639118
1179.266117
1200.000000

🔗Gene Ward Smith <gwsmith@svpal.org>

10/12/2005 2:24:14 PM

--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, "Gene Ward Smith" <gwsmith@s...>
wrote:

> ! schisynch17.scl
> Schismatic[17] in synch (brat=-1) tuning
> ! fifth satisfies f^9 + f^8 - 64 = 0

! meanschis_17.scl
!
17-tone 1/8-schisma tempered meantone scale

When I put schisynch17 into the Scala directory, Scala concluded it
was the same as meanschis_17, which is Schismatic[17] (incorrectly
claimined to be meantone, it seems to me, as there's not much point in
the schismatic thirds if you don't use them.) From a beat point of view,
1/8-schisma schismatic is quite different from synched schismatic,
which is extremely close to 5/43-schisma schismatic. One gives you
pure major thirds, and the other synched beating; brat infinity as
opposed to brat -1.