diadieor

>! diadieorw2.scl
>84-et version of diadie2.scl
>12
>!
>114.285714
>200.000000
>314.285714
>385.714286
>500.000000
>585.714286
>700.000000
>814.285714
>928.571429
>971.428571
>1085.714286
>1200.000000

Why temper this (diadie2 is pump9, a 225:224 comma-pump scale)
in orwell? Wouldn't marvel (only 225:224 in the kernel, yes?) be
more appropriate? What's in the orwell kernel?

-Carl

--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, Carl Lumma <ekin@l...> wrote:

> Why temper this (diadie2 is pump9, a 225:224 comma-pump scale)
> in orwell? Wouldn't marvel (only 225:224 in the kernel, yes?) be
> more appropriate? What's in the orwell kernel?

In the orwell kernel if I recall correctly are 225/224 and 1728/1715. I
will need to wait to get home again to check why orwell, but I presume
I got something out of it in addition to marvel. Of course, marvel
gives much better tuning accuracy.

Hi Carl,

--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, Carl Lumma <ekin@l...> wrote:

> >! diadieorw2.scl
> >84-et version of diadie2.scl
> >12
> >!
> >114.285714
> >200.000000
> >314.285714
> >385.714286
> >500.000000
> >585.714286
> >700.000000
> >814.285714
> >928.571429
> >971.428571
> >1085.714286
> >1200.000000
>
> Why temper this (diadie2 is pump9, a 225:224 comma-pump scale)
> in orwell? Wouldn't marvel (only 225:224 in the kernel, yes?) be
> more appropriate? What's in the orwell kernel?

http://tonalsoft.com/enc/o/orwell.aspx

-monz
http://tonalsoft.com
Tonescape microtonal music software

--- In tuning-math@yahoogroups.com, "monz" <monz@t...> wrote:

> > Why temper this (diadie2 is pump9, a 225:224 comma-pump scale)
> > in orwell? Wouldn't marvel (only 225:224 in the kernel, yes?) be
> > more appropriate? What's in the orwell kernel?
>
>
> http://tonalsoft.com/enc/o/orwell.aspx

If you stick to this naming scheme, the point of the tempering is
george, not orwell, as it's the 11-limit implications which might make
one consider something other than marvel.