Solo edos

Here's a definition closely allied to uniqueness: if there is only one
standard p-limit val for a division n, then we may call it solo;
otherwise nonsolo.

In the 5-limit, nonsolo edos in the 5-limit go 11, 23, 30, 42, 64, 76,
88, 95. In the 7-limit we add 6, 8, 13, 18, 28, 35, 39, 40, 49, 54,
59, 70, 71, 81, 100. In the 11-limit, to this we must add 1, 14, 16, 25,
36, 45, 47, 51, 52, 62, 66, 69, 73, 75, 83, 86, 90, 93.

>Here's a definition closely allied to uniqueness: if there is only one
>standard p-limit val for a division n, then we may call it solo;
>otherwise nonsolo.
>
>In the 5-limit, nonsolo edos in the 5-limit go 11, 23, 30, 42, 64, 76,
>88, 95. In the 7-limit we add 6, 8, 13, 18, 28, 35, 39, 40, 49, 54,
>59, 70, 71, 81, 100. In the 11-limit, to this we must add 1, 14, 16, 25,
>36, 45, 47, 51, 52, 62, 66, 69, 73, 75, 83, 86, 90, 93.

Funny; from your previous post it sounds like this would be closely
allied to consistency, but the numbers above do not correspond to
inconsistent ETs.

-Carl