back to list

PBS special

🔗DMB5561719@aol.com

9/20/1996 6:06:07 PM
The program was called: Musical Outsiders - an American Legacy.

Partch, Riley & Harrison.

Great show too. Didn't I already mention that?

D a v i d B e a r d s l e y * .. * ... .*
* .. I M M P & B i i n k! m u s i c
. .. . * .. . . .. . . . . .. .*..
. . . . * . ... dmb5561719@aol.com
* . .. . .. . * .. ... . ..
http://www.xingnet.com/immp/welcome.htm
. .. .*.. . .. . ..*. . .. . *. .


Received: from ns.ezh.nl [137.174.112.59] by vbv40.ezh.nl
with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Sat, 21 Sep 1996 08:50 +0200
Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA26142; Sat, 21 Sep 1996 08:52:18 +0200
Received: from eartha.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA27460
Received: from by eartha.mills.edu via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI)
for id XAA24405; Fri, 20 Sep 1996 23:52:16 -0700
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 23:52:16 -0700
Message-Id: <199609210250_MC1-9A7-A184@compuserve.com>
Errors-To: madole@ella.mills.edu
Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu

🔗Paul Hahn <Paul-Hahn@...>

9/21/1996 5:21:22 AM
On Fri, 20 Sep 1996, Daniel Wolf wrote:
> A question. Jonathan Walker=B4s excellent tutorial mentions Pythagoras=B4=
s
> comparison of the weights of hammers. I have encountered medieval
> illustrations of this experiment, but am not familiar with a classical
> source. In any case, comparing weights would not likely have lead to simp=
le
> ratios (anyone who has ever built a metallophone knows this - shape and
> density being equally important). Even a comparison of weights hanging fr=
om
> strings would have been inconclusive. String- and panpipe- lengths seem t=
o
> be the only successful classical means of determining ratios. Was the
> hammer experiment performed to show a negative result?

Because of conflict with acoustical reality, the story of Pythagoras and
the blacksmith's hammers is generally considered apocryphal.

--pH (manynote@library.wustl.edu or http://library.wustl.edu/~manynote)
O
/\ "Foul? What the hell for?"
-\-\-- o "Because you are chalking your cue with the 3-ball."

Received: from ns.ezh.nl [137.174.112.59] by vbv40.ezh.nl
with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Sat, 21 Sep 1996 20:46 +0200
Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA27508; Sat, 21 Sep 1996 20:48:14 +0200
Received: from eartha.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA31375
Received: from by eartha.mills.edu via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI)
for id LAA08772; Sat, 21 Sep 1996 11:48:12 -0700
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 1996 11:48:12 -0700
Message-Id: <960921184032_71670.2576_HHB59-6@CompuServe.COM>
Errors-To: madole@ella.mills.edu
Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu

🔗Jim Flannery <newgrange@...>

9/21/1996 5:55:40 PM
Daniel Wolf wondered:

>A question. Jonathan Walker=B4s excellent tutorial mentions Pythagoras=B4=
s
>comparison of the weights of hammers. I have encountered medieval
>illustrations of this experiment, but am not familiar with a classical
>source. In any case, comparing weights would not likely have lead to >si=
mple
>ratios (anyone who has ever built a metallophone knows this - shape and
>density being equally important). Even a comparison of weights hanging >=
from
>strings would have been inconclusive. String- and panpipe- lengths seem =
>to
>be the only successful classical means of determining ratios. Was the
>hammer experiment performed to show a negative result?

The classical source is Iamblicus, _Life of Pythagoras_, ch. 26. No, the=20
physics don't work. But then, the esoteric gloss on these things being=20
more important to the Pythagoreans than reproducibility, it's doubtful=20
it bothered anybody at the time.

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- / -- -- -- -- -- / -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- /
/ It isn't enough for yr heart to break because everybody's /
/ heart is broken now --Allen Ginsburg 1962 /

/ Jim Flannery jim@scientia.org / =20
/ Newgrange Media newgrange@sfo.com /
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- / -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- / -- -- -- -- -- /

Received: from ns.ezh.nl [137.174.112.59] by vbv40.ezh.nl
with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Sun, 22 Sep 1996 15:27 +0200
Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA10615; Sun, 22 Sep 1996 15:29:20 +0200
Received: from eartha.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA08884
Received: from by eartha.mills.edu via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI)
for id GAA22512; Sun, 22 Sep 1996 06:29:17 -0700
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 1996 06:29:17 -0700
Message-Id:
Errors-To: madole@ella.mills.edu
Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu