Individual Partch

Tunesmiths (re: Digest 815),

- Neil - Don't worry, Neil, I never expected everyone to agree. I sometimes
wonder in a case like this: is the argument not compelling, or am I a poor
communicator (since I don't feel that writing is my forte)? Elitism? I
think many of us have different definitions for that word. And as for "I
feel it's safe to say": I am living proof, over the last few weeks, that it
is rarely *safe* to say. Anyone remember Sir Larry Olivier in "Marathon
Man" asking Dustin Hoffman: "Is it safe?".

=====

- Enrique - Great analysis; you managed to whittle down to some of the
essences. I would only make these brief responses...

1) Optimally, yes.
2) Yes, by induction.
3)
a) I don't think I have talked much about recordings. I believe they serve
as documentation, therefore if they document a dilution of Partch (read:
transcription), then they document that dilution; if they document a valid
performance, then they do just that, but are a poor substitute for a live
performance.
b) Yes.
c) Certainly.
d) In league with a).
e) I haven't ruled this out, have I? When I win the next California Lotto,
I will personally fund as many duplicate Ensembles as I can.
4. Key phrase you use: "as the composer intended", which to me is of
paramount importance. A true sense? Probably, with recordings and videos
giving but a taste of the total picture.
5. The $64,000 question... I just *know* that somewhere, someone is
thinking that I am the Dr. Kevorkian of Partchiana. In my youth, I espoused
a truly non-committal view of this. I am pondering alternatives, though
none have cropped up just yet (see Lotto reference).
6. What about the fumes? Partch repair-persons getting high on the job,
having kids with 7 arms (makes playing those wicked Chromelodeon parts
easier...) -- where will it all end? (Is the 'plastics' another reference
to Dustin Hoffman, in "The Graduate"?)

Thanks for making me feel totally inadequate, posting in from CCRMA !

=====

- Bruce - Interesting thoughts on the recordings/transcriptions idea. The
kicker was your last "won't solve the corporeality problem"; that does it
for me. I would like to see the entire body of work represented in
documentary form (i.e. recording, video, etc.) in terms of preservation. It
would certainly allow knowledgable listeners the choice - "Ain't nothing
like the real thing, baby...". (Man, we have *got* to get Sony to
re-release the 2 Columbia albums) Thanks for your thoughts on visiting the
instruments at SDSU. This was the atmosphere that most anyone felt during
their time out here in San Diego . And what synth version of "Yankee"?

=====

Thanks, all. Education, online...
Cheers,
Jon
*--------------------------------------------------------------------*
Jonathan M. Szanto | Come visit Corporeal Meadows . . . . . . . .
Backbeats & Interrupts | . . . . . our little tribute to Harry Partch
jszanto@adnc.com | http://www.adnc.com/web/jszanto/welcome.html
*--------------------------------------------------------------------*


Received: from ns.ezh.nl [137.174.112.59] by vbv40.ezh.nl
with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 15:19 +0200
Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA29426; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 15:20:00 +0200
Received: from eartha.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA29468
Received: from by eartha.mills.edu via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI)
for id GAA13782; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 06:19:52 -0700
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 06:19:52 -0700
Message-Id: <199608231317.JAA31769@cerberus2.Ensoniq.Com>
Errors-To: madole@ella.mills.edu
Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu