positive

John Pusey appears to be correct; I don't know why I said in XH16 that
positive systems have v larger than 701.955; it makes more sense to say
larger than 700. Of course, there aren't many systems with a v between
those two.

I am looking at my own artilce after a lapse of many months, so if there
are other comments, please send them along.

I trust that John Chalmers' response on "doubly positive" answers the
question about that term.

========================== =================================
Dr. Paul Rapoport e-mail: rapoport@mcmaster.ca
SADM (Music) tel: (+1) 905 529 7070, ext. 2 4217
McMaster University fax: (+1) 905 527 6793


Received: from eartha.mills.edu [144.91.3.20] by vbv40.ezh.nl
with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 01:02 +0100
Received: from by eartha.mills.edu via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI)
for id QAA03507; Mon, 4 Mar 1996 16:02:18 -0800
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 1996 16:02:18 -0800
Message-Id:
Errors-To: madole@ella.mills.edu
Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu