why I disappeared

Just thought I'd mention why I disappeared so suddenly --

my hard drive crashed : ( : (
but I got a new one now : )

Joseph L. Monzo
monz@juno.com

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

>Uh,I think we got our lines crossed again.What I should have said is :
>Is the res. of the MR series "good enough" for all practical purposes in
>actual use ?

Oh. It's probably fair to say that that depends on what sorts of
unusual tunings you're interested in. If you expect to render *very* long,
sustained chords, in exact JI with no vibrato or most any other expressive
device, then better than 0.1Hz resoltion could potentially have value. I'm
inclined to thinkg that there probably aren't many musically-realistic
cases that require that, though.

But as for what the MR-series' and ASR-X's resolution is, I confess that
I don't personally know. Presumably John Loffink's web page lists it.





>I've been reading through the discussion on Ensoniqs that was going on
>here recently,and I don't
>quite get something : You said that the MR and ASR-X can hold only one
>"global" tuning,does this mean that it can only use one tuning at a time
>on all MIDI channels ?

I have heard that to be the case here on the list, but I didn't myself
make that that claim, nor do I personally know that for certain. But they
do support the MIDI tuning, which, from what little I do know of it, does
have significant support for dynamic tuning.