63/50

Has anyone noticed that the ratio 63/50, prime limit 7, is extremely
close to the 12TET major third? I noticed that two of the ratios in
K&S's list were 6 cents above 12TET intervals, and the interval between
them is the fairly simple 63/50. Tuning three successive 63/50s up and
an octave down yields the extremely small interval 250047/250000 (prime
limit still 7).


SMTPOriginator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
From: Manuel.Op.de.Coul@ezh.nl
Subject: RE: JI approximation to 22ET
PostedDate: 16-01-98 13:11:08
SendTo: CN=coul1358/OU=AT/O=EZH
ReplyTo: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
$MessageStorage: 0
$UpdatedBy: CN=notesrv2/OU=Server/O=EZH,CN=coul1358/OU=AT/O=EZH,CN=Manuel op de Coul/OU=AT/O=EZH
RouteServers: CN=notesrv2/OU=Server/O=EZH,CN=notesrv1/OU=Server/O=EZH
RouteTimes: 16-01-98 13:11:11-16-01-98 13:11:12,16-01-98 13:10:16-16-01-98 13:10:17
DeliveredDate: 16-01-98 13:10:17
Categories:
$Revisions:

Received: from ns.ezh.nl ([137.174.112.59]) by notesrv2.ezh.nl (Lotus SMTP MTA SMTP v4.6 (462.2
9-3-1997)) with SMTP id C125658E.0042EF39; Fri, 16 Jan 1998 13:11:06 +0100
Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA00884; Fri, 16 Jan 1998 13:11:08 +0100
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 13:11:08 +0100
Received: from ella.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA01019
Received: (qmail 26552 invoked from network); 16 Jan 1998 04:10:59 -0800
Received: from localhost (HELO ella.mills.edu) (127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 16 Jan 1998 04:10:59 -0800
Message-Id:
Errors-To: madole@mills.edu
Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu