Received: from ns.ezh.nl ([137.174.112.59]) by notesrv2.ezh.nl (Lotus SMTP MTA SMTP v4.6 (462.2 9-3-1997)) with SMTP id C1256587.005AB803; Fri, 9 Jan 1998 17:31:22 +0100 Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA08615; Fri, 9 Jan 1998 17:31:27 +0100 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 17:31:27 +0100 Received: from ella.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA14110 Received: (qmail 26258 invoked from network); 9 Jan 1998 08:31:23 -0800 Received: from localhost (HELO ella.mills.edu) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Jan 1998 08:31:23 -0800 Message-Id: <001001bd1d1b$e6a77aa0$b71dc2cf@a1a05977> Errors-To: madole@mills.edu Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
>I'm sure those that are exploring the non-octave based tunings such as Wendy >Carlos' Alpha and 88CET would prefer at least having an option other than >octave based tables.
Not surprisingly, I wholeheartedly agree with that. Ensoniq defines its tuning tables very logically and easily. I would find that a good model for others.
Being able to switch tuning tables in "banks" as Fred suggested also makes a lot of sense to me.
Received: from ns.ezh.nl ([137.174.112.59]) by notesrv2.ezh.nl (Lotus SMTP MTA SMTP v4.6 (462.2 9-3-1997)) with SMTP id C1256589.0004F1A8; Sun, 11 Jan 1998 01:16:52 +0100 Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA15146; Sun, 11 Jan 1998 01:02:21 +0100 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 01:02:21 +0100 Received: from ella.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA31589 Received: (qmail 25314 invoked from network); 10 Jan 1998 16:02:17 -0800 Received: from localhost (HELO ella.mills.edu) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Jan 1998 16:02:17 -0800 Message-Id: Errors-To: madole@mills.edu Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu