Musicworks correction

I inadvertently abbreviated Musicworks' website address. It should be

.

Paul Rapoport


SMTPOriginator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
From: sejic@nersp.nerdc.ufl.edu (World Harmony Project Inc.)
Subject: Various
PostedDate: 08-01-98 17:56:01
SendTo: CN=coul1358/OU=AT/O=EZH
ReplyTo: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
$MessageStorage: 0
$UpdatedBy: CN=notesrv2/OU=Server/O=EZH,CN=coul1358/OU=AT/O=EZH,CN=Manuel op de Coul/OU=AT/O=EZH
RouteServers: CN=notesrv2/OU=Server/O=EZH,CN=notesrv1/OU=Server/O=EZH
RouteTimes: 08-01-98 17:55:33-08-01-98 17:55:33,08-01-98 17:55:26-08-01-98 17:55:27
DeliveredDate: 08-01-98 17:55:27
Categories:
$Revisions:

Received: from ns.ezh.nl ([137.174.112.59]) by notesrv2.ezh.nl (Lotus SMTP MTA SMTP v4.6 (462.2
9-3-1997)) with SMTP id C1256586.005CF851; Thu, 8 Jan 1998 17:55:57 +0100
Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA24354; Thu, 8 Jan 1998 17:56:01 +0100
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 17:56:01 +0100
Received: from ella.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA24350
Received: (qmail 2533 invoked from network); 8 Jan 1998 08:55:58 -0800
Received: from localhost (HELO ella.mills.edu) (127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 8 Jan 1998 08:55:58 -0800
Message-Id: <199801081653.LAA45362@ufl.edu>
Errors-To: madole@mills.edu
Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu

>>[Explain decatonic scales in Partchian terms?]
>
>Did you mean something like this?
>
>Let's start with the familiar diatonic (heptatonic) scale in JI.
>
>1. 1/1
>2. 10/9 or 9/8
>3. 5/4
>4. 4/3
>5. 3/2
>6. 5/3
>7. 15/8
>-----

Yes, this is exactly what I meant. Most excellent, dude.


>This appears in Brian McLaren's article:
>----
>
>Looking at the sources listed in the back of Brian's paper, several 1874
>Bosanquet articles are listed. It is probably:
>
>>"On the temperament, or the division of the octave." Philosophical
>>Magazine, Fourth Series, Vol. 48, No. 321 (Supplement) July-December,
>>1874, article No. 27, pp. 215-218.

Rasch lists this paper in his paper, but he does not mention that it
mentioned 22 in particular. Rather, he says it presents serveral theorems
about equal temperaments in general, mostly stuff that plays with order,
class, and number of tones to make comparisons with 12tET.

I'm anxious to read the article...

Carl