TUNING digest 612

>SMART IDEA #4:
>Erv Wilson's notion of augmenting with permutation
>techniques the conventional Partchian organization
>by harmonic and subharmonic series (viz., the tonality
>diamond). Erv's technique offers a more tonally
>efficient alternative to Partch's tonality diamond,
>and it has proven exceptionally useful to just intonation
>composers.

Where can I read about this?

-Adam
asilverm@email.ir.miami.edu

Received: from eartha.mills.edu [144.91.3.20] by vbv40.ezh.nl
with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 01:18 +0100
Received: from by eartha.mills.edu via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI)
for id QAA04598; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 16:17:59 -0800
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 1996 16:17:59 -0800
Message-Id: <960124001203_71670.2576_HHB40-2@CompuServe.COM>
Errors-To: madole@ella.mills.edu
Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu

What comes closest to being an encyclopedia of scales is announced
in this posting of mine of 12 October 1995:

> The scale archive with the collections of John Chalmers and myself
> has been updated and contains now over 1250 scales.
> The scales.doc file contains the complete listing. It's found here:

> http://www.cs.ruu.nl/pub/MIDI/DOC/scales.doc (readme file, ASCII)
> http://www.cs.ruu.nl/pub/MIDI/DOC/scales.zip (ZIP file, binary)

> Use the "-a" option while unzipping. The size of the ZIP file is about
> 284 Kb. FTP is possible also from ftp.cs.ruu.nl.
> The file format of the scales is that of my tuning program Scala,
> which I hope will be available soon. The files are text files so also
> usable without it.

Later I found some duplicates in the archive but they will be removed in
a next version.


> >- have a mode-fitting algorithm operate on a given scale and look
> >if it's similar to a mode (of equal temperament) in the list,
> This is a nice idea. I'd be interested
> in the sort of algorithm you use. It
> will somewhat depend on how similar
> "similar" is, of course.

It's fairly simple. It looks for the best approximation for
successively higher equal divisions. Every time the approximation is
better (having a lower least-squares difference) than the previous
ones, it's printed out with the root-mean-square difference given. So
you can decide, looking at that number whether it's similar enough, or
look closer at deviations of individual pitches. The tricky part is
the procedure to "round off" a pitch to an integer number of equal
tempered steps.
I've done a posting about this on 1 September 1994. It has a
description of the algorithm.

Manuel Op de Coul coul@ezh.nl

Received: from eartha.mills.edu [144.91.3.20] by vbv40.ezh.nl
with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 17:46 +0100
Received: from by eartha.mills.edu via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI)
for id IAA16258; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 08:46:48 -0800
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 08:46:48 -0800
Message-Id: <9601241632.AA13274@us2rmc.zko.dec.com>
Errors-To: madole@ella.mills.edu
Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu