FWD: Bach's Tuning (correction)

On Sat, 23 Sep 1995, I wrote:
> The problem with this is that Marpurg is simply wrong. A temperament
> with all major thirds sharper than pure (which is _all_ that we really
> know about Bach's tuning from evidence like this) is by no means
> required to have all fifths flat; that is a much, much stricter
> requirement. It is triviality itself to think of lots of tunings in
> which all thirds are wide but many fifths are just. Barnes, Vallotti,
> Werckmeister III, and any number of Neidhardt's tunings all fulfill
> these conditions, just to start with.
>
> If you know of any documents in which Kirnberger himself, not filtered
> through his rhetorical adversary Marpurg, admits that Bach tuned all
> fifths flat, please cite it.

In the above passage, please substitute "all fifths flat or all thirds
smaller than Pythagorean" for "all fifths flat", etc.

--pH (manynote@library.wustl.edu or http://library.wustl.edu/~manynote)
O
/\ "Do you like to gamble, Eddie?
-\-\-- o Gamble money on pool games?"

Received: from eartha.mills.edu [144.91.3.20] by vbv40.ezh.nl
with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Sat, 23 Sep 1995 17:37 +0100
Received: from by eartha.mills.edu via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI)
for id IAA02134; Sat, 23 Sep 1995 08:36:56 -0700
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 1995 08:36:56 -0700
Message-Id: <9509230836.aa04138@cyber.cyber.net>
Errors-To: madole@ella.mills.edu
Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu