back to list

RE: repeating patterns

🔗"Paul H. Erlich" <PErlich@...>

12/10/1997 2:04:34 PM
>>Here's something I've wanted to try, maybe someone already has. Suppose I
>>took two 12TET scales separated by 80/81. Then one would have both nice
>>sounding thirds and a wide open modulation horizon.
>
>I did this quite some time ago and also posted a question whether anyone else
>had. I separated the scales by 15 cents rather than 80/81 to produce better
>thirds.
>
>>One idea I had for a keyboard setup was to use the left hand on one 12TET
>>and
>>the right hand on the other. Then to play a simple diatonic scale one might
>>have a pattern like RRLRRLLR.
>
>All major triads have the root and fifth in the left hand, the third in the
>right hand. All minor triads have the root and fifth in the right hand, and
>the third in the left hand. This was about the most sophisticated tuning I
>could get out of my Casio CZ-1. Taken to its logical limit, this idea leads
>to 72TET (which, besides the nearly pure triads, has unique representations
>of all 11-limit intervals and is consistent through the 17-limit).
>
>>If I understand how the "k-limit" term is used, it might be useful to make a
>>finer distinction. Suppose I take a set of notes (2**n)(3**m)(5**p) where n
>>and m are unbounded but p is constrained to be 0 or 1. My understanding is
>>that this scale would be called 5-limit. The scale where p is also allowed
>>unbounded values would also be 5-limit. Perhaps the case of unbounded
>>exponents is not of sufficient interest to merit a new term?
>
>I don't think the case of BOUNDED exponents is of sufficient interest to
>merit a new term; someone finding themselves imposing such constraints may be
>better served by the odd-limit definition I (and Partch) use rather than the
>prime-limit definition you seem to be suggesting above.
>
>>Jim
>
>-Paul


SMTPOriginator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
From: "Paul H. Erlich"
Subject: Reply to Gregg Gibson
PostedDate: 11-12-97 00:07:37
SendTo: CN=coul1358/OU=AT/O=EZH
ReplyTo: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
$MessageStorage: 0
$UpdatedBy: CN=notesrv2/OU=Server/O=EZH,CN=coul1358/OU=AT/O=EZH,CN=Manuel op de Coul/OU=AT/O=EZH
RouteServers: CN=notesrv2/OU=Server/O=EZH,CN=notesrv1/OU=Server/O=EZH
RouteTimes: 11-12-97 00:06:09-11-12-97 00:06:09,11-12-97 00:05:54-11-12-97 00:05:55
DeliveredDate: 11-12-97 00:05:55
Categories:
$Revisions:

Received: from ns.ezh.nl ([137.174.112.59]) by notesrv2.ezh.nl (Lotus SMTP MTA SMTP v4.6 (462.2
9-3-1997)) with SMTP id C1256569.007EE333; Thu, 11 Dec 1997 00:07:53 +0100
Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA12151; Thu, 11 Dec 1997 00:07:37 +0100
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 00:07:37 +0100
Received: from ella.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA12142
Received: (qmail 14092 invoked from network); 10 Dec 1997 15:07:27 -0800
Received: from localhost (HELO ella.mills.edu) (127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 10 Dec 1997 15:07:27 -0800
Message-Id:
Errors-To: madole@mills.edu
Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu