back to list

Theory vs. Practice

🔗Carl Lumma <clumma@...>

9/23/1997 10:01:50 AM
The recent "pop in microtones" issue is one I had planned to avoid, since it
seemed that any contribution I could make would be destructive. But, maybe
I've found a way...

There is a difference between compositional models and methods of
performance. Musicians will always play things differently between one
another, and between performances. My high school choir sang in crappy
5-limit JI. The only things that play in 12:2 equal are a few pianos, some
guitars, and many synthesizers. No band, choir, or orchestra performs in
12-tone. Why do you think piano concertos sound so bad?

Actually, all music is microtonal (unless it's played on a hammond organ or
a very special additive synthesizer) because of the harmonics! Yeah!

The point of JI is that it offers an expanded compositional model. Music
composed in such a model will no doubt be played in all sorts of ways by the
musicians of the future. An understanding of tuning is not a prerequisite
for playing this music, as DFinnamore@aol.com suggests; our future musicians
will be making more powerful music because it will be based on a more
powerful model.

If we can agree that there is a difference between re-tuning music made for
100 cent equal, as powerful a model and good-sounding a tuning as it is, and
playing music made for 7+ limit Just Intonation, however embellished, then
maybe we can be free to appreciate the excellent musicianship that thrives
in every idiom the world over.

Carl

Postscript: I get more milage from BBshop than Mr. Szanto, and I'm
wondering what "4tet fan" means.



SMTPOriginator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
From: alves@orion.ac.hmc.edu
Subject: Re: pop and tunings
PostedDate: 23-09-97 19:05:50
SendTo: CN=coul1358/OU=AT/O=EZH
ReplyTo: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
$UpdatedBy: CN=notesrv2/OU=Server/O=EZH,CN=coul1358/OU=AT/O=EZH,CN=Manuel op de Coul/OU=AT/O=EZH
RouteServers: CN=notesrv2/OU=Server/O=EZH,CN=notesrv1/OU=Server/O=EZH
RouteTimes: 23-09-97 19:05:37-23-09-97 19:05:38,23-09-97 19:04:44-23-09-97 19:04:44
DeliveredDate: 23-09-97 19:04:44
Categories:
$Revisions:

Received: from ns.ezh.nl by notesrv2.ezh.nl (Lotus SMTP MTA v1.1 (385.6 5-6-1997)) with SMTP id
C125651B.005DE293; Tue, 23 Sep 1997 19:05:28 +0200
Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA12692; Tue, 23 Sep 1997 19:05:50 +0200
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 19:05:50 +0200
Received: from ella.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA12678
Received: (qmail 21077 invoked from network); 23 Sep 1997 17:05:42 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO ella.mills.edu) (127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 23 Sep 1997 17:05:42 -0000
Message-Id:
Errors-To: madole@mills.edu
Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu